Chinmayee Deulgaonkar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MRV Forum Day 1 #26310

    Q.2 Traceability linkages are essential for MRV standard. The farm records, yield, area of cultivation, satellite image, local government policies are to be verif

    in reply to: MRV Forum Day 1 #26309

    Q.2 Traceability linkages are essential for MRV standard. The farm records, yield, area of cultivation, satellite image, local government policies are to be verified.

    in reply to: MRV Forum Day 1 #26308

    Q1
    1. Anti-deforestation policy
    2. Identification of regulatory and legal requirements associated with land, human rights, environment
    3. documentation the scope of its supply chain management system
    4. Map the supply chain – including identifying the geographical source of the agricultural commodities or related products in the supply chains and the key actors involved insourcing
    5. Assess the risks of deforestation, identification of mitigation plans
    6. Assess the risks of human rights breaches and mitigation plan
    7. risks that have or may have a significant impact on the environment
    8. Promote forest-positive outcomes
    9. traceability system

    Q.2 Traceability linkages are essential for MRV standard. The farm records, yield, area of cultivation, satellite image, local government policies are to be verified.

    in reply to: Introduction Forum – MRV Course #26009

    This is Chinmayee Deulgaonkar, FoodChain ID India. I have 27 years of experience, out of which 24 years is in auditing, certification, training, regulatory compliance services. I have done 3000+ audits, trained 1500+ professionals for IRCA approved FSSC 22000 Lead Auditor and BRCGS Lead Auditor courses. I am National Resource of FSSAI, trained officers from Dubai Municipality, Kazakhstan govt. etc I represent India in ISO forums. Speaker at 1200+ national and international conferences including GFSI, Gulfood, Gulffod manufacturing. INSEAD Global Leadership Program. Masters in Food Technology.

    in reply to: ProTerra V5.0 – Case study #25892

    1. Sampling would be carried out based on geographical spread, number of suppliers in region and risk based approach.
    Amazon: square root of 148 i.e. 13 samples
    Caatinga: 20% of 12 i.e. 3 samples
    Cerrado: Squate root of 731 i.e. 28 samples

    2. Onsite audit of supply chain actor should be done. Verification of core suppliers should also be done. Audit report shall be submitted to the economic opertor in 5 working days. All the NC’s shall be closed within 30 days after end of last core audit verification. Incase of core non coformity certificate will not be issued. Economic operator should meet min 80% of all applicable clauses and 100% core compliances

    The ProTerra certification audit is to occur at the site of the economic operator and within a maximum of 60 days at the site of all the core suppliers. The certification decision shall be made after all core suppliers selected for sampling, have been verified.

    3. Considerations for next certification cycle:
    – Review of Initial Audit Findings and Corrective Actions. Check will corrective actions are implemented well.
    – Assess any continual improvements in concern area.
    -Any changes in ProTerra standards and if yes, compliances has been done as per updated version.
    – Traceability- Check is complete traceability is possible accross the supply chain from till customer till the supplier. Backward and forward both traceability should be ensured.
    – Environmental and social impact assesment is done or revised.
    – REgulatory requirements compliances

    4. One ProTerra certificate will be issued to the Economic operator. This certificate would apply to the certified operation and its products

    Direct Indicators:
    Decrease in Forest Area: This is the most obvious indicator, measured by the net loss of land classified as forest over a specific period. This can be tracked using:
    Satellite Imagery Analysis: Comparing satellite images from different time points reveals areas where forests have been cleared. This is a widely used and effective method for large-scale monitoring. Various platforms like Global Forest Watch utilize satellite data to show forest loss in near real-time.  
    Aerial Photography: Similar to satellite imagery but often provides higher resolution for smaller areas.
    Ground-based Surveys: Direct measurement and mapping of forest boundaries, although resource-intensive and limited in scale.
    Forest Fragmentation: Even if the total forest area doesn’t drastically decrease, the breaking up of large, continuous forests into smaller, isolated patches is a significant indicator of deforestation and habitat loss. This can be observed through spatial analysis of satellite or aerial imagery.  
    Loss of Primary/Old-Growth Forests: The conversion of intact, primary forests to other land uses (e.g., agriculture, plantations) is a critical indicator due to the high biodiversity and carbon storage capacity of these forests. Specific satellite datasets and ground assessments can help identify this type of loss.
    Change in Forest Type: Conversion of natural forests to monoculture plantations (e.g., palm oil, timber) indicates deforestation in terms of biodiversity and ecological function, even if tree cover remains. This can be detected through detailed vegetation classification using remote sensing data.  
    Increase in Non-Forest Land Use within Forested Areas: The expansion of agriculture (cropland, pasture), infrastructure (roads, settlements), mining, or other non-forest land uses within or adjacent to forest areas signals deforestation drivers.
    Deforestation Linked to Specific Activities: Identifying deforestation events directly correlated with specific activities like logging, agricultural expansion for specific commodities (e.g., soy, palm oil), or mining projects provides crucial insights into the drivers of forest loss.

    Step 1: Gather Background Information:
    Review existing data: Look for any prior ecological surveys, species lists, habitat maps, or environmental reports for your area. Contact local environmental organizations, government agencies, or universities for available information.
    Understand the site history: How has the land been used in the past? This can provide context for the current biodiversity. Identify relevant policies and regulations: Are there any local, regional, or national biodiversity conservation policies that apply to your site? ProTerra date Dec 2020, EUDR date 30 Dec 2025) Decide the indicators like Habitat loss and fragmentation, invasive Species, genetic diversity, Protected Area Coverage: data collection, ecological diversity etc Indicator 4.2.1

    Step 2: Evaluate the methods used by the economic operators for biodiversity, environment and deforestation assessments. e.g. Habitat mapping, species inventories etc. How organization has developed a biodiversity management plan, aiming to identify, maintain, and protect biodiversity. The plan should be developed by competent people, internal or external. Indicator 4.3.1

    Step 3: Look for evidence of: clear articulation of the assessment process., Use of recognized methodologies and standards., Consideration of relevant data and information., Traceability of decisions and conclusions. Ask for satellite and/or aerial images and mapping. Comparing satellite images from different time points reveals areas where forests have been cleared is a widely used and effective method for large-scale monitoring. Various platforms like Global Forest Watch utilize satellite data to show forest loss in near real-time. Forest Fragmentation: Even if the total forest area doesn’t drastically decrease, the breaking up of large, continuous forests into smaller, isolated patches is a significant indicator of deforestation and habitat loss. This can be observed through spatial analysis of satellite or aerial imagery.

    Step 4: How data is analyzed . Statistical analysis of forest cover data, combined with socio-economic and environmental data, helps identify trends, drivers, and potential future deforestation risks. Machine learning algorithms are increasingly used to automate the detection of deforestation from satellite imagery.

    Some indirect indicators of deforestation are increased agri activity, commodity price, increased population / infrastructure, weak governance.

    in reply to: ProTerra V5.0 – Introduction Forum #25821

    Hi. I am Chinmayee Deulgaonkar, Managing Director, FoodChain ID India. Out of 27, I have 24 years of solid experience in Certification sector. Some of my credentials are as follows.
    1. 3000+ mandays of audits (food safety, regulatory compliance, packaging, sustainability, product safety)
    2. Trained 2000+ lead auditors for FSSC 22000 or BRCGS Food Safety
    3. Speaker at 1200+ conferences including GFSI, Gulfood, Gulfood Manufacturing
    4. Trained regulatory officials of FSSAI, FDA, Dubai Municipality, Kazakhstan govt.
    5. Represented India in drafting FAD 15, FAD 36 committees for drafting ISO 22003 standards
    6. Part of Indian regulations committees.
    7. Part of FAO’s team in writing Basic Hygiene Practices for ASEAN countries.
    8. INSEAD Global Leadership Program spanning over 9 months
    9. Alumina of US Department of State
    10. Masters in Food Science and Technology, Graduation in Horticulture

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)